Afaal’s Column

Archive for May, 2009

Complaints Vs Compliments

by afaal on May.31, 2009, under Health Care

complaintsFollowing on from the write up on mishaps and mistakes, I would now reflect on complaints and compliments in the hospital. Every time a customer is unhappy about something in the hospital, they make a complaint. Be it waiting a while in queue for the doctor up to issues of food served while admitted to the hospital. How easy is it to lodge a complaint though? Most of the time even at ADK Hospital, customers will complain because they were not able to lodge a complaint easily. So what can be done to hear people out and make it easy for people to lodge a complaint? Simple, make it easy for anyone to lodge a complaint. Establish a complaint management system and let people know about it. If we do this, we get complimented for handling a complaint. Isn’t that nice? But again we need to change a culture of many years to do that.

In the short period that I have been managing ADK Hospital, customers have told me that the front office is very reluctant to let them meet the management. Why? Is it fear that they may be reprimanded? Or is it because they want to hide a possible mistake from the management? Well, I asked around my staff about this. Talked directly with them and the answer is none of what I have just mentioned. The answer usually is “no reason” or “it’s the way it has been always.” This doesn’t surprise me at all. What I am finding hard is to change such cultures. It is not necessarily their fault too. Even at home if we do try to hide anything that might get us into trouble, don’t we? I guess that’s where we all come from.

Well my challenge now is to design a proper complaint handling mechanism and implement it. What do I get in return? Compliments! I hear a lot of complaints and what I do is listen. Try to explain but not to show excuses. If genuine, accept and see what we can improve on. Showing the way from the top is also helping a bit but we will have a long way to go to perfect it. One of the biggest satisfactions that I got so far in my short career managing a hospital started from a complaint. A customer called me and complained of an issue about his wife’s condition. She was not having any progress neither was the doctor able to determine what is happening. I offered to help the customer by getting a second opinion. Facilitated an appointment to another doctor and guess what? Two days later, the customer calls me back to thank me. It was even better; he said that he canceled the air ticket to Colombo to show his wife to the doctor because of the service that he got, a compliment from a complaint. This could have been done by anyone in the hospital. It’s just a matter of listening and courtesy. There is no restriction for anyone in the hospital in the way I acted in this case.

Very few people measure compliments. I feel that measuring the compliments is also a good way to assess our performance. Every time when I walk around the hospital, there is one spot that I stop for while. Just to see whether my staff got a new compliment. At the nurses’ station, there are heaps of written compliments from patients. Laminated with colours and pictures too. Many doctors’ also have such tokens of compliments they receive from patients kept in their consultation rooms. I feel happy to see these. That is a positive sign that the staff is putting an effort to uphold our motto – caring about you when you need it most. I make a point to congratulate and appreciate their work too. When I ask the staff about these compliments they show emotions and comfort. Those compliments help drive them to perform. It gives them satisfaction and touches their hearts. It is mutual isn’t it? We touched the patients’ hearts when they needed it and in return they touch ours.

2 Comments more...

Mistakes and Mishaps!

by afaal on May.30, 2009, under Health Care

stomach_stapling_031208_22When someone goes to a hospital to seek services they expect the best. Anything less is unacceptable. This is a common phenomenon irrespective of where ever you are in the world. Sure enough, no one wants to go to hospital unless absolutely necessary and of course they want to get better as quickly as possible.

But how perfect are hospitals? How perfect are the people who work there?

A mistake or a mishap in a hospital is a big thing. It points a lot of fingers, becomes a major media headline and lead to accusations of intentionally disabling someone or even worse killing someone. Healthcare providers are always on the alert, continuously conscious trying to avoid any such incidence in the hospital they work in. The irony is that something happens when you least expect it. Such incidences are detrimental to the hospital and the professionals since people loose confidence and trust in them. It is always said that Maldivians go abroad for treatment because they do not have confidence in the services. I see that the Maldivian health care system has a major challenge to achieve their trust and confidence.

What is alarming but true are the statistics from the world’s most advanced health systems. The following are some statistics that I collected from expert presentations from the UK, US, Australia and so forth. In the UK about 10% of patients admitted to hospitals face some adverse event. In Canada almost 13% and in Australia almost 17% of all patients admitted to hospitals face and adverse event. Every year almost 19,000 babies are dropped by doctors while taking deliveries, over 20,000 wrong prescriptions are given and over 5,000 surgeries are done on the wrong side in some of the world’s most advanced health systems. It was shown that in the US alone some 98,000 people die in hospital due to medical errors per year. Over all more than 80% of all mishaps in hospitals are due to human error.

However, unlike any other business health professionals will not be able to call back the patient. Nokia could recall faulty batteries and replace them, but an ovary that was taken out by mistake cannot be recalled back and replaced. Is it possible for health care settings to achieve the expectation of 100% perfection?

So how do health care providers compensate for this?

Continuously improving the quality of care delivery is the most important thing. Thriving to achieve perfection should be their goal. But even then when and if such a mistake or mishap occurs, a good investigation and full disclosure to the concerned patient and family would perhaps help. Showing empathy and a sincere apology would at least gain respect and a bit of confidence from the patients. Unfortunately this is the hardest to do. Not only in the Maldives but all across the world. However, in fact in some countries such practices have shown very positive outcomes for hospitals. In the US, adverse events in hospitals are such an issue that there is now a Coalition of doctors, insurers, patients, lawyers, administrators and researchers called “The Sorry Works Coalition” joined together to provide a solution for medical mistakes, mishaps and also malpractice (www.sorryworks.net). Though the sorry works, the efforts should not stop there. Health care providers shall keep thriving. Thriving to reach that level of expectation.

What can patients do and what are their roles? Well the best thing is to empower themselves to what their rights and responsibilities are while in a hospital. Making sure that you question the professionals till you are satisfied and understand your treatments, investigations and procedures. If you need a second opinion let the professional who is treating you know that and you can even refuse treatment till you are convinced that you should go ahead with it. This may offend some professionals but it is your right. Get professionals to accept you as an equal partner in determining the treatment you get.

Though hard to achieve, once the patient and the provider are in harmony on these issues, healthcare provision will have very good outcomes with the best of satisfaction. It will help build the confidence and trust between the patient and the provider.

After all to err is just human!

Leave a Comment more...

Free Health Care – Part 2 the Maldivian situation

by afaal on May.30, 2009, under Health Insurance

reception The government funds the public health care sector in the Maldives, as we all know. In fact whatever care that is provided by the government outside of Male’ is actually FREE! People had to pay a minimal amount for some x-rays and scans. So in a typical health post or a health centre, there is no cost recovery. In the atoll and regional hospitals the recovery will be about 4% maximum. The problem though is the non-availability of medicines, and the huge cost of travel. The issue with medicines is that Maldives has a competitive market for pharmaceuticals that is completely private. Some may say STO, one of the largest distributor is not private, to which I do not fully agree since that is public company that operates on a free market. This is more like the US health system. Large percentages of people don’t have access i.e. medicines are too expensive as well.

When it comes to seeking health services in Male’, where more sophisticated medical care is available, the costs are much much higher. First the main complain is that health care is very expensive. Why? Because we have to pay out of our pockets. Expert opinion on this is that out-of-pocket payments are the most regressive financing system in the world. Despite this, IGMH is also heavily subsidized and recovers only about 40% of the expenditure.

In year 2001, I wrote my Masters dissertation titled “Healthcare Financing – a case for Reform in the Maldives”. My research looked at the insurance schemes available at that time in Maldives and did an analysis to propose a conceptual model for a social health insurance scheme. My proposal was a national scheme that is accessible and open. Although will not go all out to insure every single citizen in the country but provide a competition in the insurance market.

During the first insurance scheme introduced, which collapsed before it even really started, I happened to work for the Technical Committee. I wrote a concept paper that the Committee submitted to the government. Two important prerequisites for the scheme that I proposed in the paper was a legal framework and awareness creation, none of which was implemented before the scheme was put into effect. If these prerequisites were met, that scheme could perhaps have its benefits even now. But that is now history and most of you know the reasons for the collapse of that scheme through the media.

Now in the current political environment, health care is high on the agenda of many presidential manifestos. Some providing free health care, some looking at a contributory mechanism, some building more hospitals and the previous government introducing a scheme just one month before the election etc.

Some fundamental points I note is that, from researching the worlds most advanced and advancing health systems, “free” health care is not attainable. Nor can any country achieve the perfect health care financing system. For the Maldives the biggest opportunity is to learn from the failures of the others. We tend to fall into the same pits that people fell many years ago. Our solution shall have strategic direction, one that is sustainable and benefits generations to come. Not just an election promise.

Ideally, the way I see it is that we need the following.

  1. A solid legal framework – especially one that looks at consumer protection and simultaneously protecting the providers from heavy financial losses.
  2. A vigorous campaign to educate the public on health insurance. I believe that we are really not aware of the benefits, exclusions and possible consequences and of course the fine print. For example in my first hand experience, the two tourists in Male’ were badly burnt during the Sultan Park explosion and their insurance company did not cover even one cent of the treatment, both here and in the UK.
  3. There should be a nation scheme administered by a government authority but shall not attempt to cover every citizen of the country. The national scheme should cover the civil service, the poor (we do not have a proper poverty line and a mechanism to identify the real poor) and the unemployed (again a grey area) and the retired. Employers should also have a responsibility for health care of their employees. The current Employment Act failed badly on this provision (one of the failures of the Act amongst many).
  4. The scheme should invest generated capital and continuously enhance the system from the profits. Should have 100% transparency and independent audit reports published nationally.

I believe that there is no such thing as FREE health care. Do u ever get a free ride?

(This article was initially published on my old blog at afaal.blogspot.com on Thursday, September 25, 2008. I have republished it with some modifications)

1 Comment more...

Free Health Care – Part 1 the context

by afaal on May.29, 2009, under Health Insurance

health_insurance1Is there any such thing as free health care? Or is it just an attractive jargon that pleases people? Health care is a basic right for every citizen of every country and Governments are supposed to provide appropriate access to services, a statement well understood by everyone!

In the recent past there has been a lot of talk about health care reform in almost all corners of the world. Health care reform becomes a major talking point of each political election. In the 1990’s economists in their quest to find better and efficient ways to finance collapsing health care systems started the health care reform jargon. With advancement and sophistication in health care interventions, escalating costs left governments and the public struggling to afford health care and hence more and more people did not have access to health care, even in the developed world.

If we look at the most advanced health systems of the world for example, the United Kingdom is one that boasts “free” health care. But the National Health System (NHS) of the UK have in the recent years struggled to cope with the costs and slowly are moving towards a more market based system. Free health care is mainly seen in economies with high taxation. However even with this, there is division for example in the UK Labour Party whether to introduce a new health tax to supplement the already expensive over 53 billion pounds NHS budget (The Guardian, November 30, 2001). Who pays? The people! Do we call this ‘free’ health care? Experts agree that the UK health system is on one extreme of financing spectrum, not a very good one.

On the other extreme in the US where health care financing is based mainly on private insurance. This system has left millions without access to health care. Why? People can’t afford healthcare. No wonder, health care becomes a major campaign slogan of every American election. In the present presidential campaign in the US, Barrack Obama is proposing government subsidies on the current expensive market based system (Times, September 29, 2008). According the expert consensus, US has one of the most regressive health care financing system in the world.

Countries like France have made their health systems more responsive by innovation. Social Health Insurance schemes with co-payments and capitation have improved the sustenance of their systems. However, still there are questions about such systems. For example in the last election campaign of the previous Premier of Australia, John Howard in his campaign promised ‘free” healthcare for all Australians. But just 3 months into him term after election, he raised the health care tax rate – his answer to the public? If the government implemented free health care Australia will go bankrupt and he said something along the following lines “I’m sure Australians will forgive me since my financial advisors were wrong at that time. I cannot make Australia go bankrupt just because I made an election promise.

Coming to the context of the Maldives which is what we need to get worried about, we have has a system that is extremely regressive. Out of pocket payments have made people beg for health care. Many families have gone into unrecoverable debt since they had to borrow for health care. However, slowly the concepts of insurance are creeping into the country. A good sign, but how sustainable is it? We saw the first Government Employees Insurance Scheme collapse before even it was really born. A bitter experience! Now the new scheme “Madhana” is claiming that it is a more promising scheme. We have to wait and see.

Failure of the government to implement a proper scheme to finance the Maldivian health care system, the current political environment have made health care financing one of the talking points. Some of the candidates promising ‘free’ health care! I will write a second part of this article shortly. The Maldivian context.

(This article was initially published on my previous blog at afaal.blogspot.com on Wednesday, September 24, 2008. A modified version of this was also published at Dr. Waheed’s blog on Thursday, November 27, 2008)

1 Comment more...

The Doctor Patient Relationship!

by afaal on May.29, 2009, under Health Care

docpatnt“You are feeling better today,” announced the Doctor, as he sat down by patient’s hospital bed.

Patient:  “Really? What’s better?”

“Well,” doctor sputtered, his face flushing, “in my professional opinion, you are better!”
Patient: sighed “ I don’t think so, I still feel the same, and tired “

Doctor:  “Your lymphocytes are better and you should feel better,”
Patient stops reacting, unhappiness visible on his face.

Can you hear the tension in this encounter? Why are doctors and patients so often at odds? Why are both expressing more frustration and less satisfaction? To answer these questions, more and more researchers are putting the doctor-patient relationship under the microscope. What they are finding is fascinating.
Tug of war is because doctors and patients are on different ends of the rope.

  • To the doctor, illness is a disease process that can be measured and understood through laboratory tests and clinical observations. To the patient, illness is a disrupted life.
  • The doctor’s focus is more on keeping up with the rapid advances in medical science than on trying to understand the patient’s feelings and concerns. Yet patient satisfaction comes primarily from a sense of being heard and understood.
  • Many doctors do not see the role of physician as listener, but instead view their function more as a human car mechanic: Find it and fix it. Yet patients often feel devalued when their illness is reduced to mechanical process.
  • Doctors feel frustrated, even betrayed, when patients withhold pertinent information. Yet patients who use alternative medicine, for example, may not tell their doctors for fear of ridicule or being labeled as “silly” or uneducated.

Changes in our culture and in the practice of medicine have also added tension to the doctor-patient relationship.

In some ways we have become more doctor dependent, because we see doctors sooner than people did 50 years ago, yet we are less dependent on the doctor for information and decision making.
All these changes are unsettling for both doctors and patients. Then there’s the blame factor. Doctors often blame patients when communication breaks down. But researchers have found that many doctors have shaky interviewing skills. For example

  • Doctors do more talking than listening. A new study published this year in Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that 72% of the doctors interrupted the patient’s opening statement after an average of 23 seconds. Patients who were allowed to state their concerns without interruption used only an average of 6 more seconds.
  • Doctors often ignore the patient’s emotional health.
  • Doctors underestimate the amount of information patients want, and overestimate how much they actually give. In one study of 20-minute office visits, doctors spent about 1 minute per visit informing patients but believed they were spending 9 minutes per visit doing so.

So what about the patients?

Patients aren’t perfect either. In one survey doctors rated 15% of their patients as “difficult.” Disagreements involve everything from expecting an instant cure to demanding prescriptions.
While one doctor’s difficult patient may be another doctor’s favorite, researchers have identified common characteristics of patients that everyone agrees are hard to manage. Patients described as “frustrating” by some doctors have the following characteristics.

  • Do not trust or agree with the doctor.
  • Present too many problems for one visit.
  • Do not follow instructions.
  • Are demanding or controlling.

Patients who use the doctor as a scapegoat for their anger at the illness are less likely to get good care. “Doctors are profoundly influenced by the demeanor, comments, and attitudes of their patients.” A patient who is consistently rude and irritable will almost certainly not receive the same medical care as a patient who conveys more positive attitudes.

In spite of all these problems, there is reason for hope. Yes, doctors and patients will always be on opposite ends of the health care system, but that doesn’t mean they can’t pull in the same direction. In fact they can be partners in care. After all the goal for both the patient and the doctor is to get a cure!

Both the doctors and patients can contribute making this relationship better. For instance doctors can try and cultivate a patient-centered partnership. “The patient desires to be known as a human being, not merely to be recognized as the outer wrappings for a disease. In a video-taped study of 171 office visits, doctors who encouraged patients to talk about psychosocial issues such as family and job had more satisfied patients and the visits were only an average of two minutes longer. Incidentally, doctors also benefit from the patient-centered approach, researchers note, because they feel more job satisfaction and are less likely to burn out.

To improve patient compliance, doctors can work on mutual trust. Research confirms that the health of the doctor-patient relationship is the best predictor of whether the patient will follow the doctor’s instructions and advice. Respect patients as experts in the experience of illness. Patient-centered relationship that accepts the patient’s unique knowledge as just as important to outcome as the doctor’s scientific knowledge. “The medical visit is truly a meeting between experts.”

Similarly patients have some obligations too! Patients can contribute building this relationship as much as the doctors can.

Patients are obliged to provide complete and accurate information about their health and the condition they are in at the time of contact with the doctor. Its not only the duty of the doctor to ask all information from the patient. There is an obligation to ask questions as well. Especially if the doctors’ instructions or explanations are not clear, patients have a right to ask questions and make a dialogue with the doctor till they fully understand.

Participating actively in care is also an obligation of the patient. Especially if in pain, patients can costribute to care by reiterating the effectiveness and/or the ineffectiveness of the interventions given to them. Also patients are obliged to treat caregivers with respect and courtesy and also to keep to appointment times as well.

In short, the best outcome of care will be in those instances where there is a good relationship between the caregivers and the care seekers. A partnership where both benefit by reaching the same goal.

(This article is a combined work of Dr. Jayashankar, Senior Registrar Urology at ADK Hospital and myself)

2 Comments more...

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

Archives

All entries, chronologically...